An Indiana lawyer was suspended for 30 days for blogging about a judge’s malfeasance in the administration of an estate. The court found that the lawyer’s allegations in the blog “were not just false; they were impossible” because a different judge at the time was presiding in the estate matter. The blogging lawyer should have determined this fact before blogging. By not doing that he violated Rule 8.2(a). Read the full decision at http://www.in…
Follow us on& Like us on