From the article.
“Reportedly, more than half of North American and European companies are developing a bring-your-own-device (BYOD) policy. But with the benefits of BYOD come many challenges. This Article explores the risks associated with BYOD, and offers practical solutions for employers seeking to maintain a secure corporate network”.
The full text is available here
Originally published on South Carolina Lawyer (March 2016)
Related Rules of Professional Conduct
Model Rules of Professional Conduct 1.1, 1.6
Mentioned Ethics Opinions
- State Bar of Ariz. Op. No. 05-04, July 2005
- Ariz. Bar Op. No. 09-04, Dec. 2009
- N.J. Comm. on Prof. Ethics Op. 701 (Apr. 24, 2006)
- Nev. Standing Comm. on Ethics and Prof. Resp. Formal Op. 33 (Feb. 9, 2006)
- Va. Standing Comm. on Legal Ethics Op. 1818 (Sept. 3, 2005)
Related Material
- F.R.C.P. 37(e)
- Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), as amended by the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act
- The Freedom of Information Act
- Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 §§12
- U.S.C. 6801-6809 (2012)
- SEC Rule 17a-4(b)(4), 17 C.F.R. 240
- Conn. Gen. Stat. Ann. § 31-48d
- 19 Del. C. § 705 (2008)
Mentioned Case Law
- Qualcomm Inc. v. Broadcom Corp., 2010 WL 1336937 (S.D. Cal.)
- Painter v. Atwood, No. 2:12-CV-01215- JCM, 2014 WL 1089694, at (D. Nev. Mar. 18, 2014)
- Lester v. Allied Concrete Co., Nos. CL08- 150, CL09-223 (Va. Cir. Ct. Sept. 1, 2011)
- In re Heartland Payment Sys., Inc. Customer Data Sec. Breach Litig, 834 F. Supp. 2d 566 (S.D. Tex. 2011)
- Doe v. Avid Life Media, No. Case 2:15-cv-06405 (C.D. Ca. Aug. 21, 2015)
- City of Ontario v. Quon, 130 S. Ct. 2619 (2011)