WP29 issues Opinion 8/2014 on the Internet of Things (“IoT”)

From the WP29’s press release “The European data protection authorities, assembled in the Article 29 Working Party (WP29) at its Plenary meeting of 16 and 17 September, adopted an opinion on the Internet of Things (IoT). Drawing the attention on the privacy and data protection challenges raised by “smart things” which are gradually entering our daily […]

Tags: , ,

Peter Hustinx, EU Data Protection Law: The Review of Directive 95/46/EC and the Proposed General Data Protection Regulation

Conclusion form the article: “The outcome of the current review of Directive 95/46/EC – and of the EU legal framework for data protection more in general – is not yet entirely clear, but its main direction now seems irreversible and well beyond the point of no return. In any case, a few conclusions may be […]

Tags: ,

Kwang Bae Park & Hwan Kyoung Ko, Korea toughens information and communication privacy regulation

PL&B International (August 2014 issue)  From the article: “Law applies to information and communication service providers (ICSPs) as well as website operators and online content providers, and includes strict direct marketing provisions..” The full text can be downloaded (with subscription) at: http://www.privacylaws…

Tags: ,

Stephen E. Henderson, and Andrew E. Taslitz, Reforming the Grand Jury to Protect Privacy in Third Party Records

64 Am. U. L. Rev. 195 (2014) Abstract: “In late 2014, two grand juries returned controversial no bill decisions in police killings, one in Ferguson, Missouri, and one in New York City. These outcomes have renewed calls for grand jury reform, and whatever one thinks of these particular processes and outcomes, such reform is long […]

Tags: ,

Nina Marrot, (Un) Safe Harbor under Court of Justice of the European Union scrutiny

The author discusses the question referred by the Irish High Court to the European Court of Justice (Case 2013 765 JR) of whether “a national data protection authority has to blindly follow the Commission’s Decision (Safe Harbor)” or if such authority is able to carry out its own review of a third country’s level of data […]

Tags: ,

Stefan Schuppert and Tim Wybitul, Irish High Court Refers Questions to European Court of Justice: Can National DPAs Disregard Safe Harbor?

The author discusses the question referred by the Irish High Court to the European Court of Justice (Case 2013 765 JR) of whether “national data protection authorities in Europe may disregard the Safe Harbor decision of the European Commission when assessing whether the U.S. recipient of data ensures an adequate level of data protection required under […]

Tags: , ,

1 8 9 10 11 12 18