Date 03/06/2018.
American Bar Association Standing Committee on Ethics and Professional Responsibility Topic: Confidentiality Obligations for Lawyer Blogging and Other Public Commentary “Lawyers who blog or engage in other public commentary may not reveal information relating to a representation, including information contained in a public record, unless authorized by a provision of the Model Rules.” […]
Tags: ATTORNEY ADVERTISING, ATTORNEY WEBSITE, ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE, INFORMED CONSENT, LAWYERS' DUTY OF CONFIDENTIALITY, LAWYERS' USE OF SOCIAL NETWORKS
Date 04/03/2017.
Colorado Bar Association Ethics Committee Topic: lawyer’s posting or sharing of materials Conclusion of the Committee: “In many situations, making information obtained in the course of representing a client public is helpful, either to other lawyers or to educate the public. But client confidences must be respected. When a client gives informed consent to […]
Tags: ATTORNEY ADVERTISING, ATTORNEY WEBSITE, ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT, ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE, LAWYERS' DUTY OF CONFIDENTIALITY
Date 11/28/2016.
In November 2016, the DC Bar Legal Ethics Committee issued Ethics Opinion 370 (Social Media I) and 371 (Social Media II), which address the use of social media by lawyers for marketing and personal use and for providing legal services. The two opinions aim at increasing awareness of the ethical issues generating from the increasing use […]
Tags: LAWYERS' DUTY OF COMMUNICATION, LAWYERS' DUTY OF COMPETENCY, LAWYERS' DUTY OF CONFIDENTIALITY, SUPERVISION OF LAWYERS AND PARALEGALS
Date 11/23/2016.
Opinion No. 371 of the District of Columbia Bar’s Legal Ethics Committee Topic: Social Media II, Use of Social Media in Providing Legal Services Conclusion of the Committee: “Social media, like other technology applicable to the practice of law, will continue to change. The principles explained in this Opinion should be applied to […]
Tags: LAWYERS' DUTY OF COMMUNICATION, LAWYERS' DUTY OF COMPETENCY, LAWYERS' DUTY OF CONFIDENTIALITY, SUPERVISION OF LAWYERS AND PARALEGALS
Date 11/23/2016.
Opinion No. 370 of the District of Columbia Bar’s Legal Ethics Committee Topic: Social Media I, Marketing and Personal Use Conclusion of the Committee: “Social media is a constantly changing area of technology. Social media can be an effective tool for providing information to the public, for networking and for communications. However, using […]
Tags: DATA PROTECTION, LAWYERS' CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, LAWYERS' DUTY OF COMMUNICATION, LAWYERS' DUTY OF COMPETENCY, LAWYERS' DUTY OF CONFIDENTIALITY, PROSPECTIVE CLIENTS, SUPERVISION OF LAWYERS AND PARALEGALS, US PRIVACY
Date 12/30/2015.
Topic: Attorney Advertising and LinkedIn Digest: “An attorney’s individual LinkedIn profile or other content constitutes attorney advertising only if it meets all five of the following criteria: (a) it is a communication made by or on behalf of the lawyer; (b) the primary purpose of the LinkedIn content is to attract new clients to […]
Tags: ATTORNEY ADVERTISING, LAWYERS' USE OF SOCIAL NETWORKS, SOLICITATION OF CLIENTS
Date 11/04/2015.
List of ethics opinions around the country on social media and judges on National Center for State Courts: http://www.ncsc.org/Topics/Media/Social-Media-and-the-Courts/State-Links.aspx?cat=Judicial%20Ethics%20Advisory%20Opinions%20on%20Social%20Media
Tags: JUDGES’ USE OF SOCIAL NETWORKS
Date 10/27/2015.
On September 22, 2015, the West Virginia Office of Disciplinary Counsel Legal Ethics issued a comprehensive opinion to provide the guidance for lawyers on the use of social media for both business and personal matters. West Virginia Office of Disciplinary Counsel Legal Ethics Opinion 2015-02 Lawyer Disciplinary Board – L.E.O. 2015-02 The Disciplinary Board provided […]
Tags: ATTORNEY ADVERTISING, ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE, LAWYERS' DUTY OF COMMUNICATION, LAWYERS' DUTY OF COMPETENCY, LAWYERS' DUTY OF CONFIDENTIALITY, SANCTIONS FOR LITIGATION MISCONDUCT, SOLICITATION OF CLIENTS
Date 04/02/2015.
On March 10, 2015, the New York County Bar Association (NYCLA) issued opinion Formal Opinion 748 to offer guidance on whether a lawyer can ethically maintain a LinkedIn profile and when it constitutes advertisement. According to the opinion, attorneys may maintain profiles on LinkedIn but they must ensure that all information and endorsements in their […]
Tags: ATTORNEY ADVERTISING, LAWYERS' USE OF SOCIAL NETWORKS, SOLICITATION OF CLIENTS
Date 03/10/2015.
Committee on Professional Ethics Topic: The ethical implications of attorney profiles on LinkedIn From the digest: “Attorneys may maintain profiles on LinkedIn, containing information such as education, work history, areas of practice, skills, and recommendations written by other LinkedIn users. A LinkedIn profile that contains only one’s education and current and past employment does not […]
Tags: ATTORNEY ADVERTISING, LAWYERS' USE OF SOCIAL NETWORKS, SOLICITATION OF CLIENTS