Federal Court awards defendant comprehensive e-discovery costs under 28 U.S.C. § 1920(4) because of overly broad discovery request

The District Court of Colorado determined cost shifting was appropriate because of the requesting party litigation choices and aggressive course of discovery resulted in heightened defense costs. In this case, the Clerk of the Court awarded $57,873.61 of taxable costs against the Plaintiff. Defendant, who prevailed on summary judgment, incurred into those costs as a […]

Federal court identified a “new and simpler approach” to ediscovery after years of parties’ non cooperation

In this case of breach of license agreement, after several discovery disputes among the parties, on December 9, 2014, a federal court fashioned a what it called a “new and simpler approach” to e-discovery, including the identification of 13 search terms/phrases to be utilized when searching Plaintiff’s corporate documents. Armstrong Pump, Inc. v. Hartman, No. 10-CV-446S, 2014 […]

Privilege review under claw back order not limited to TAR & “eyes on” review allowed, VA district court holds

On October 29h, 2014, the US District Court, S.D. West Virginia entered an order allowing both computer-assisted and linear review after the parties disagreed on the procedure for identifying privileged information. In this case, the parties met in an effort to “craft an agreement respecting the handling of attorney-client and work product information inadvertently disclosed”. […]

U.S. Supreme Court to decide whether angry Facebook posts should be protected by the First Amendment- oral argument Dec. 1, 2014

On December 1, 2014, the US Supreme Court considered whether aggressive posting on Facebook should be considered as a “true threat” violating federal law or as a mere exercise of free speech right protected . Elonis v. United States. The posts in question were “directed” to the former wife of the author of the posting. While […]

Texas prosecutors shall adopt an “open file” policy for all criminal defense lawyers

Texas Ethic Opinion 646 Professional Ethics Committee for the State Bar of Texas   Topic: Prosecutor right to require criminal defense lawyers to keep confidential discoverable information contained in the prosecutor’s file. Statement of facts “A district attorney requires criminal defense lawyers to sign a confidentiality agreement as a condition to granting lawyers access to […]