Passive Lawyer Review of Jurors’ Internet presence is ethical. ABA Formal Opinion 466

The ABA Standing Committee on Ethics and Professional Responsibility recently issued an opinion addressing lawyers’ review of jurors’ internet presence distinguishing: (i) a “passive lawyer review” (i.e., a juror’s webpage is publicly available and the juror is unaware of lawyer’s review); (ii) an “active lawyer review” (i.e., the lawyer actually requests access to the juror’s […]

Massachusetts Ethics Opinion 14-5

Massachusetts Bar Association Ethics Opinion 14-5 [Approved by the Massachusetts Bar Association’s House of Delegates on May 8, 2014]   Topic: lawyer’s contact with unrepresented party via social network Summary: “A lawyer for a party may “friend” an unrepresented adversary in order to obtain information helpful to her representation from the adversary’s nonpublic website only when […]

Social media gag order requested

A defense attorney is asking a Laurens County judge to issue an order to silence people connected to a murder case from public talking or posting about it. The victim’s mother has been posting to social media to remember her daughter. She dedicated a Facebook page to her and she is involved in rallies against […]

Technology and Ethics (“Technethics”) – 2013 in Review – Part Two

Originally published as Ethics Watch: Technology and Ethics (“Technethics”): 2013 in Review, South Carolina Lawyer 14 (March 2014) Bidding on the name of a competitor firm to obtain a sponsored link above the competitor in a Google search does not violate Wisconsin’s privacy law.  Under Wisconsin law use of a person’s name for advertising purposes without […]