Draft of consumer privacy bill moves ahead

On April 15, 2015, the Energy and Commerce Committee of the US House of Representatives approved the “Data Security and Breach Notification Act” by a vote of 29 to 20. The draft legislation aims to tackle data security threats at a national level. The document will be taken up in the House next week. More […]

California court held that employers can look for candidates’ trusted references on LinkedIn (but the service has been discontinued)

On April 14, 2015, in Sweet v. LinkedIn Corporation, a California District Court held that reference searches conducted through LinkedIn do not amount to background checks. LinkedIn Reference Searches are not protected under the Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”), and therefore employers are not subject to its requirements, (e.g. obtaining candidate’s written permission, disclosures obligations). In this […]

Facebook sued in Illinois for using biometrics data for its “tag suggestions” – class certification sought

On April 1, 2015, Facebook received a class action complaint and demand for jury trial for having allegedly violated users’ privacy by collecting and using their biometric data. According to the complaint, through its “tag suggestions” program, Facebook scans all pictures uploaded by users and identifies any Facebook friends they may want to tag. Plaintiff […]

DNT will no longer be a default setting for Microsoft

On April 3, 2015, Microsoft announced that the Do Not Track option will no longer be a default setting in its Windows browsers. Do Not Track is a technology that enables users to opt out of tracking by websites they do not visit, including analytics services, advertising networks, and social platforms. According to Microsoft blog, […]

An update on Case C-362/14 (the ECJ to decide whether European judges are still “absolutely bound” by Safe Harbor)

On March 24, 2015, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) heard arguments on case C-362/14. The ECJ is called to decide on whether national judges are “absolutely bound” by a company’s declaration to participate in the Safe Harbor, or whether they could still conduct their own investigations to determine if personal data are protected according […]