New Hampshire Bar Association Opinion #2012-13/4

New Hampshire Bar Association’s Ethics Committee  (submitted for publication by the NHBA Board of Governors at its February 21, 2013 meeting) Topic: The Use of Cloud Computing in the Practice of Law Summary of the Committee: “The internet has changed the practice of law in many ways, including how data is stored and accessed. ‘Cloud […]

David Gray, Danielle Keats Citron, A Shattered Looking Glass: The Pitfalls and Potential of the Mosaic Theory of Fourth Amendment Privacy

14 North Carolina Journal of Law and Technology 381 (2013) Abstract: “On January 23, 2012, the Supreme Court issued a landmark non-decision in United States v. Jones. In that case, officers used a GPS-enabled device to track a suspect’s public movements for four weeks, amassing a considerable amount of data in the process. Although ultimately […]

David Gray, Danielle Citron, Addressing the Harm of Total Surveillance: A Reply to Professor Neil Richards

126 Harvard Law Review Forum 262 (2013) Abstract: “In his insightful article The Dangers of Surveillance, 126 HARV. L. REV. 1934 (2013), Neil Richards offers a framework for evaluating the implications of government surveillance programs that is centered on protecting “intellectual privacy.” Although we share his interest in recognizing and protecting privacy as a condition […]

Maine Board of Overseers of the Bar Opinion #207

Professional Ethics Commission Topic: The Ethics of Cloud Computing and Storage Question presented to the Commission: “Is it ethical for Maine attorneys to use cloud computing and storage for client matters?” Short answer of the Commission: “Yes, assuming safeguards are in place to ensure that the attorney’s use of this technology does not result in […]

David G. Ries and John W. Simek, Encryption Made Simple for Lawyers, GPSolo Vol. 29 No. 6 (Nov./Dec. 2012)

A publication of the American Bar Association   From the Article: “Encryption is a topic that most attorneys don’t want to touch with a ten-foot pole, but it is becoming a more and more important part of security. Encryption is an electronic process to protect data. It has now reached the point where all attorneys […]

State Bar of California Formal Opinion 2012-184

State Bar of California Standing Committee on Professional Responsibility and Conduct Formal Opinion 2012-184 Topic: Virtual Law Office Digest of the Committee: “As it pertains to the use of technology, the Business and Professions Code and the Rules of Professional Conduct do not impose greater or different duties upon a VLO practitioner operating in the […]

Jerry Kang, Katie Shilton, Deborah Estrin, Jeff Burke, and Mark Hansen, Self- Surveillance Privacy

97 IOWA L. REV. 809, 822-24 (2012) Considering how individuals are sharing personal data, the authors suggest the creation of the “Privacy Data Guardian”, a new profession that manages Privacy Data Vaults. The article explains the technical specification of such approach, highlighting the fiduciary relationship between client and Guardian, and recommending that the Privacy Data […]

Charles Doyle, Wiretapping, Tape Recorders, and Legal Ethics: an Abridged Overview of Questions Posed by Attorney Involvement in Secretly Recording Conversation

CRS Report for Congress R42649 The report describes the view of American jurisdictions on attorneys recording of conversations. In the majority of jurisdictions a “recording with the consent of one, but not all, of the parties to a conversation is not unethical per se unless it is illegal or contrary to some other ethical standard” […]

Steven C. Bennett, The “Right to Be Forgotten”: Reconciling EU and US Perspectives

30 Berkley J. INT’L L. 161, 164-68 (2012) The European Union is developing its “right to be forgotten”. According to the author, this right could prove particularly harmful toward United States Internet companies. The article outlines the practical implications of the European right to be forgotten, pointing out possibilities to reconcile American and European views […]