Maine Board of Overseers of the Bar Opinion #194

Professional Ethics Commission Topics: Client Confidences: Confidential firm data held electronically and handled by technicians for third-party vendors From the opinion: “[A]n attorney may utilize transcription and computer server backup services remote from both the lawyer’s physical office and the lawyer’s direct control or supervision without violating the attorney’s ethical obligation to maintain client confidentiality. […]

Pennsylvania Bar Association Opinion 2007-100

Committee on Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility Topic: Rights of Access, Possession and Copying, Along with Retention Considerations From the Opinion: “This Formal Opinion supersedes all prior inconsistent opinions of the Committee and should be reviewed for guidance by Pennsylvania lawyers when they are opening, closing or taking other action with respect to the contents of […]

State Bar of Nevada Formal Opinion 33

Standing Committee on Ethics and Professional Responsibility – Formal Opinion 33 Topic: cloud computing Summary of the Committee: “A lawyer may, without client consent, store client files in an electronic format or on a server or other device that is not exclusively in the lawyer’s control provided the lawyer acts competently and reasonably safeguards the […]

Joel A. Osman, Technology and the Challenge of Maintaining Client Confidences, (County Bar Update, October 2005, Vol. 25, No. 9)

Los Angeles County Bar Association   From the Article “The California Constitution declares that we all have a right to privacy. Even with this constitutional protection, privacy as a practical matter is getting harder to maintain in the modern world. Every time you use a credit/debit card, drive your OnStar-equipped car, use a cell phone, […]

State Bar of Arizona Ethics Opinion 05-04

Arizona State Bar Association Committee on the Rules of Professional Conduct   Topic: Electronic storage; Confidentiality From the Opinion: “ER’s 1.6 and 1.1 require that an attorney act competently to safeguard client information and confidences. It is not unethical to store such electronic information on computer systems whether or not those same systems are used to connect […]

Massachusetts Bar Association Opinion 05-04

[Approved by the Massachusetts Bar Association’s House of Delegates on March 3, 2005]   Summary of the Committee: “A law firm may provide a third-party software vendor with access to confidential client information stored on the firm’s computer system for the purpose of allowing the vendor to support and maintain a computer software application utilized […]

Delaware State Bar Association Opinion 2001-2

Committee on Professional Ethics  Topic: E-mail Encryption Conclusion of the Committee: “The transmission of confidential information by way of e-mail or mobile (or cell) phone, absent extraordinary circumstances, does not violate Rule 1.6. Extraordinary circumstances include circumstances in which the lawyer should reasonably anticipate the possibility that his or her communication could be intercepted and confidences […]